I would support a small number of pet-friendly residences, but students should know the arrangement before moving in. Some people have allergies or are afraid of animals. They should still have suitable rooms elsewhere. The rules would need to explain cleaning, noise, and who is responsible if an owner travels. I would also want staff to check whether the rooms are suitable for the animals. Allowing pets should involve more than simply adding an extra fee to the housing bill.
- before moving in · 说搬进去前就要知道规则,时间点很清楚
- who is responsible if an owner travels · 补上主人出门后谁来照顾,让规则更周全
I'd be open to a carefully managed option in selected residences. It could help pet owners, but shouldn't disadvantage residents with allergies, fears, or a need for quiet. Students would need clear information before choosing a room, and there should be suitable alternatives. I'd also want rules that address the animal's needs, not just complaints from neighbours: space, exercise, cleaning, and arrangements when the owner is away all matter. Charging an extra fee wouldn't solve those issues by itself. I would start small, involve housing staff in setting workable conditions, and review actual problems before extending the policy to more buildings.
- a carefully managed option · 说支持的是管得好的尝试,给赞同加上条件
- arrangements when the owner is away · 举出主人不在的情况,提醒提前安排照顾