小岸托福去考一场
托福访谈题 · 文化与社会

托福访谈题:回收习惯

从一次不知道怎么回收的经历,问到校园该不该把回收海报换成常见垃圾的照片。 每题两篇范文,约 4 分和约 5.5 分,写清楚第二篇为什么分高。

先自己答

先答一题,再看范文

选一道题,听完题目在 45 秒内作答。答完再对照范文,比先读范文更容易看出差在哪。

选一道题

Can you describe a recent occasion when you were unsure how to recycle something, and tell me what you did?

听完就开口,和考场一样最多 45 秒。面试官是合成语音。不用注册,每天 3 次。

先听一遍题目。

第 1 题 · 你的经历

Can you describe a recent occasion when you were unsure how to recycle something, and tell me what you did?

约 4 分

81 词

Last week, I finished a takeaway drink and did not know where to put the cup. It looked like paper, but the inside had a smooth layer. I checked the pictures on the bins near our library, but none showed that kind of cup. I finally asked a cleaner, who pointed me to the correct bin under our local rules. I realised that wanting to recycle is not always enough. The instructions also need to match the things students actually use.

  • looked like paper · 说看着像纸,解释自己为什么会分错类
  • under our local rules · 用 local 限定当地规则,没说各地都一样

约 5.5 分

102 词

A takeaway cup confused me outside the library last week. It looked like paper, but the lining and plastic lid made me unsure whether the parts belonged together. I asked a cleaner, and she explained where each part went under our campus collection system. I was glad I'd asked, but I also wondered how many people would have time to do that. The experience made me notice the gap between a general message to recycle and the small decisions people actually face. A photograph of that common cup on the sign would probably have helped me more than another broad environmental slogan.

  • made me unsure whether · 说自己不确定该怎么分,分类时的困惑更清楚
  • the gap between · 指出宣传和实际指引有差距,解释哪里还不够
5.5 分比 4 分好在哪
展开
4 分那篇最后说说明要贴合实际物品。5.5 分那篇多想了一步:别人未必有时间去问,并提出在标识上放这种杯子的照片。
用词
4 分那篇绕着说杯子内侧 “smooth layer”。5.5 分那篇直接用 “lining” 和 “lid” 两个准确名词。
第 2 题 · 你的选择

Would you rather sort recyclable items into several bins where you live or take them together to a staffed collection point once a week?

约 4 分

80 词

I would rather use several bins where I live. I usually have only a small amount of waste each day, and sorting it immediately seems easier than keeping a bag for a week. Our dormitory has bins near the stairs, so I pass them on my way to class. A staffed point would be useful for unusual items, like broken electronics. For everyday bottles and paper, though, I prefer clear signs and a place that is close to my room.

  • on my way to class · 说上课路上就能扔,解释垃圾桶放哪才方便
  • like broken electronics · 举出坏电器,说明哪些东西适合集中回收

约 5.5 分

98 词

I'd prefer sorting everyday items near my room, as long as the signs were clear and the bins were emptied regularly. Convenience matters because recycling is a small decision I make repeatedly, often when I'm rushing to class. If I had to store everything and remember a weekly visit, I'd probably miss some collections. A staffed point would still be valuable for batteries or equipment, where I might need guidance. I wouldn't choose between the two for every type of waste. I'd make routine sorting easy at home and use specialized collection for things that require extra care.

  • as long as the signs were clear · 补上标识清楚这个条件,偏好更合理
  • routine sorting · 用 routine 区分每天分类和处理特殊物品
5.5 分比 4 分好在哪
展开
4 分那篇说每天垃圾少、马上分更省事。5.5 分那篇讲清为什么方便最重要:回收是天天重复的小决定,每周跑一趟自己很可能会漏掉。
衔接
4 分那篇中间提一句集中点适合电子产品,又转回日常物品。5.5 分那篇结尾不再二选一,而是按垃圾类型给两种方式分工。
用词
4 分那篇直接说偏好,没有条件。5.5 分那篇开头用 “as long as” 说清偏好成立的前提:标识清楚、按时清空。
第 3 题 · 你的看法

Some people argue that individual recycling efforts are pointless unless companies reduce packaging first. To what extent do you agree?

约 4 分

81 词

I agree that companies should use less packaging, but I do not think my own effort is pointless. I can sort the waste I already have and also choose products with less unnecessary wrapping. Last month, our dormitory collected a box of old notebooks for recycling. That did not solve the whole problem, but it was still better than mixing them with food waste. I think companies and individuals have different jobs, and one group should not wait for the other.

  • the waste I already have · 说先处理手头的垃圾,给出个人能做的事
  • wait for the other · 说双方不用互相等,可以各自先做起来

约 5.5 分

99 词

I agree with the criticism of excessive packaging, but not with the idea that individual action becomes meaningless. If a company wraps a small item in several layers, it has created a problem that careful sorting alone won't solve. Still, once that material reaches my room, I have a choice about what happens next. Our residence recently collected old notebooks separately, and that was a practical improvement even though it didn't change how shops package products. Calling personal effort pointless could remove the easiest action available without creating any extra pressure on the companies responsible for the larger decisions.

  • careful sorting alone won't solve · 用 alone 说光认真分类还不够
  • once that material reaches my room · 说材料到了自己手里就得处理,责任分得更清楚
5.5 分比 4 分好在哪
展开
4 分那篇最后只说双方不该互相等。5.5 分那篇还推出反方观点的后果:说个人努力没用,只会少掉最容易做的事,也不会给企业多加压力。
衔接
4 分那篇只说企业和个人分工不同。5.5 分那篇用 “Still,” 接上先后顺序:包装是企业造成的,到了自己房间后才轮到个人选择。
第 4 题 · 更大的议题

Should universities replace general recycling posters with detailed pictures of common campus waste, even if keeping those signs updated requires more staff time?

约 4 分

81 词

I think detailed pictures would be worth the extra work. I often see cups, food boxes, and plastic wrappers near the campus bins. A poster saying we should protect the environment does not tell me where those things belong. The university could start with the most common items and update the signs when its collection rules change. Students could also report confusing items through a simple form. Clear practical information would help me more than seeing the same general message again.

  • the most common items · 建议先写最常见的物品,做法容易开始
  • when its collection rules change · 说收集规则一变就更新标识,时间点很清楚

约 5.5 分

103 词

Yes, I'd prioritize useful instructions at the point where people throw things away. I already know the university wants us to recycle; what I need is help deciding where a takeaway lid or food container belongs. The facilities team could begin with a few busy locations and ask cleaners which mistakes happen most often. Updating signs would take time, but dealing with incorrectly sorted waste also uses staff effort. I'd want the pictures checked against the actual collection system, so they remain accurate. A small set of clear examples seems more valuable than a campus full of messages that don't guide the decision.

  • at the point where · 建议在扔垃圾的地方给提示,让人当场知道怎么分
  • checked against the actual collection system · 说标识要对照实际收集办法,确保照着做不会错
5.5 分比 4 分好在哪
展开
题目问到要多花人手。4 分那篇只说值得。5.5 分那篇正面回应:分错的垃圾本来也要人去处理,所以多花的时间有抵消。
用词
4 分那篇把需求说成清楚实用的信息,比较笼统。5.5 分那篇用 “at the point where” 讲清信息该出现在扔垃圾的地方。

按 45 秒倒计时把这 4 题答一遍