小岸托福去考一场
托福访谈题 · 学习与校园

托福访谈题:大学生睡眠习惯

从作息影响学业的一次经历,问到大学该不该取消早上九点前的必修课。 每题两篇范文,约 4 分和约 5.5 分,写清楚第二篇为什么分高。

先自己答

先答一题,再看范文

选一道题,听完题目在 45 秒内作答。答完再对照范文,比先读范文更容易看出差在哪。

选一道题

Thinking about the past semester, can you tell me about a time when your sleep routine affected something you needed to do at university?

听完就开口,和考场一样最多 45 秒。面试官是合成语音。不用注册,每天 3 次。

先听一遍题目。

第 1 题 · 你的经历

Thinking about the past semester, can you tell me about a time when your sleep routine affected something you needed to do at university?

约 4 分

74 词

I remember a morning when I nearly missed a presentation. I had stayed up until two to finish the slides, and I turned off my alarm without getting up. My roommate woke me twenty minutes before class. I arrived on time, but I forgot part of my introduction. After that, I tried to finish important work before midnight. My sleep time is more regular now, and I feel less worried before a morning class.

  • stayed up until two · 说熬夜一直到 2 点,经历有了时间细节
  • After that · 用 After that 接着说之后怎么改

约 5.5 分

104 词

Last semester, I stayed up polishing the slides for a group presentation, even though my part was already clear. The next morning, I could barely follow my teammates and lost my place halfway through my introduction. Nobody complained, but I knew the extra formatting hadn't helped our presentation. Since then, I've set a stopping time for work the night before anything important. I leave myself a short checklist instead of trying to finish every tiny detail. For our next presentation, I slept normally and explained similar material more confidently. That experience made sleep feel like part of preparing, rather than a reward for finishing.

  • lost my place · 说讲到一半忘了讲到哪,熬夜的影响更好懂
  • a reward for finishing · 说不再把睡觉当作做完事的奖励,想法变化更清楚
5.5 分比 4 分好在哪
展开
4 分那篇的改法只有一句午夜前做完;5.5 分那篇写出定停工时间、留清单,结尾还想明白睡觉也是准备的一部分。
衔接
4 分那篇从忘词直接跳到改习惯;5.5 分那篇中间用 “hadn't helped” 说明熬夜抠格式没换来好处,改变就有了理由。
用词
4 分那篇说忘了部分开场白;5.5 分那篇用 “lost my place”,说清是讲到一半找不到进度。
第 2 题 · 你的选择

If you had an important assignment to finish, would you rather work late at night or get up early the next morning, and why?

约 4 分

77 词

I would rather get up early. Our dormitory is usually quiet before seven, so I can read and write without many messages arriving. Last month, I finished a history report that way. I left the notes on my desk at night and started again after breakfast. I do not always enjoy leaving my bed, but my head feels clearer in the morning. Working late makes me slow, and I often have to correct the same paragraph again.

  • would rather get up early · 用 rather 直接说自己更愿意早起
  • have to correct · 说之后还得改错,补上熬夜的额外麻烦

约 5.5 分

103 词

I'd choose an early start, provided I had already made a clear plan the evening before. When I work late, I tend to spend ages changing sentences without improving the argument. Before a recent history deadline, I stopped at eleven, wrote down the three sections still missing, and put my phone across the room. I started again at six thirty and finished before my first lecture. The useful part wasn't simply getting up early; it was knowing exactly where to begin. I wouldn't leave an entire assignment until the morning, though. One missed alarm would be stressful, especially with a submission system problem.

  • provided I had already made · 补上事先准备好的条件,早起才说得通
  • knowing exactly where to begin · 说起床就知道从哪开始,解释为什么早起有用
5.5 分比 4 分好在哪
展开
两篇都举了历史作业的例子。4 分那篇只说前一晚把笔记放桌上;5.5 分那篇写出几点停、列下缺的三部分,并点明有效是因为知道从哪开始。
衔接
4 分那篇结尾直接接一句熬夜的坏处;5.5 分那篇开头用 “provided” 设条件,结尾用 “though” 补限制,两头对得上。
用词
4 分那篇说熬夜 “makes me slow”;5.5 分那篇用 “spend ages” 改句子却没改好论点,说清慢在哪里。
第 3 题 · 你的看法

Some students say that sleeping less during exam week is worth it if you can revise more material. How far do you agree with that statement?

约 4 分

76 词

I mostly disagree because extra study time is not always useful. During my first exam week, I read my notes very late and forgot many details the next day. I was looking at the pages, but I was not really learning. Now I choose the main topics and review them before going to bed. I may study a little longer on one evening, but I do not want to make short sleep my normal exam plan.

  • not always useful · 用 not always 说多复习未必都有用
  • the main topics · 说先看主要话题,复习取舍有实际办法

约 5.5 分

105 词

I don't think it's a good trade for me. As a freshman, I read nearly an entire economics chapter overnight, then struggled to explain its main idea in a practice question the next afternoon. I had covered more pages, but that wasn't the same as understanding them. These days, I test myself on a few likely topics and stop when I start reading the same line repeatedly. An occasional late night might be unavoidable, especially with several deadlines together. Still, I wouldn't build my revision plan around it. I'd rather enter the exam able to use what I know than vaguely remember seeing every page.

  • a good trade · 用 trade 说这笔时间花得值不值
  • that wasn't the same as understanding them · 区分看过和看懂,解释熬夜读完未必有用
5.5 分比 4 分好在哪
展开
4 分那篇只说熬夜后 “forgot many details”;5.5 分那篇说清读的是经济学一章,第二天做练习题讲不出主旨。
展开
4 分那篇的新做法是睡前复习重点;5.5 分那篇改成自测几个可能考的题,还给了停下的信号:同一行读了好几遍。
用词
4 分那篇用 “mostly disagree” 直接表态;5.5 分那篇用 “a good trade”,把问题说成拿睡眠换复习量值不值。
第 4 题 · 更大的议题

Do you think universities should avoid scheduling compulsory classes before nine in the morning, even if that means some classes finish later in the afternoon?

约 4 分

76 词

I think universities should try this, but they should ask students first. My earliest class starts at eight, and some classmates travel for almost an hour. A later start would help them arrive in a better state. However, students with evening jobs might not want more late classes. I would suggest moving the biggest lectures first and checking the results for one term. The school could then see whether attendance improves before changing the whole timetable.

  • should ask students first · 建议先问学生,再决定要不要调整
  • before changing the whole timetable · 说先试再改整张课表,安排有先后次序

约 5.5 分

105 词

I'd support a trial, particularly for large compulsory lectures. My university draws students from several distant neighbourhoods, and an eight o'clock start means some of them leave home before seven. Moving those lectures to nine could make attendance more manageable. However, shifting everything later might create problems for students who work evening shifts or collect younger siblings after school. I'd ask students to compare timetable options before choosing one. It could test the change in one department and look at attendance as well as student feedback. That seems more useful than assuming that everyone would benefit equally from a later start, regardless of their circumstances.

  • draws students from · 说学生从不同地方来,解释为什么要考虑通勤
  • attendance as well as student feedback · 说出勤和学生反馈都要看,判断办法更全面
5.5 分比 4 分好在哪
展开
两篇都主张先试行。4 分那篇只用出勤率看效果;5.5 分那篇把出勤和学生反馈一起看,范围也定在一个院系。
衔接
4 分那篇讲完试点就结束;5.5 分那篇最后用 “benefit equally” 回扣前面打工、接弟妹的学生,说明为什么要先试。

按 45 秒倒计时把这 4 题答一遍